So, Lucent is falling behind, and we are falling behind with them.
Whether or not the standard is "official", other vendors are offering
superior v.90 support, and our customers expect it. Apparently this is
part of the price of sticking with Lucent/Livingston.
On 6/29/98 4:52 PM, Scott Sears (sears@telalink.net) wrote
>A situation arose today when a customer insisted that the ITU standard is
>official, and that the delay in ratifying the standard is only a
>formality. He sited this page:
>
>http://www.itu.int/newsroom/press/releases/1998/98-04.html
>
>He claimed that if Lucent wasn't fully supporting the standard, then they
>are "falling behind" and we are falling behind with them.
>
>I know this isn't true, but it did occur that all of my sources are
>Lucent based. I had no proof to return fire with.
>
>Can anyone provide me with sources other than Lucent that I can refer
>customers to regarding the current state of v.90?
>
>Thanks!
-- Russ Taylor (rtaylor@cmc.net, http://www.cmc.net/~rtaylor/) Chambers Multimedia Connection Help Desk "So, how's Robin?" -- The Joker- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>