Re: (PM) ascend 2 b channel on demand
Christopher Masto (chris@netmonger.net)
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:13:33 -0500
On Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 05:31:09PM -0800, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
> >My point was this: some routers don't require the server to do anything
> >special. Some routers have brains and can figure out to add drop channels
> >on their own. Ascend's can't. For those of using LE, Ascend simply
> >doesn't work *now*, and therefore has been entirely dropped from my
> >acceptable hardware list.
>
> Which Lucent must think is a bad thing since they *are* adding BACP support.
> Why else would they?
It certainly _should_ be a goal to provide work-arounds for their
competitors' deficiencies.
--
Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>
Director of Operations, NetMonger Communications, Inc.
+1-516-221-6664 http://www.netmonger.net/ info@netmonger.net
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>