Re: (PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE

Mark Radabaugh (mark@woodville.net)
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:53:13 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Glynn: "Re: (PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE"
Previous message: Jacob Suter: "Re: (PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE"
Maybe in reply to: David Glynn: "(PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE"
Next in thread: Stephen Fisher: "Re: (PM) Routing help"

>THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR SLC or ANY 'REMOTE' CONNECTED LINE NOT TO GET
>KFLEX CONNECTIVITY.

My impression from this list was that a SLC in the line ALWAYS killed K56
connections. Am I mistaken in this belief?

mark@woodville.net

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.

Next message: David Glynn: "Re: (PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE"
Previous message: Jacob Suter: "Re: (PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE"
Maybe in reply to: David Glynn: "(PM) SLC's, PM-3's, and GTE"
Next in thread: Stephen Fisher: "Re: (PM) Routing help"