> I have posted a couple of questions on NT routing to the list with little
> to no reply. Let me tell you what I am doing.
> I have a pm2er with LAN address 206.40.43.0 netmask 255.255.255.128
> so I am using half of a class C.
> Now I route an NT off of that box using an address off my ethernet
> as the NT's WAN address, for example 206.40.43.17.
> This routes to a subnet 206.40.44.160 255.255.255.224.
>
> Is this legal?
> I have this working in 2 locations, but am having problems in a 3rd
> location. Livingston says its improper routing.
I see nothing improper. It sounds like you have a PM on perhaps
206.40.43.5 with a netmask of 255.255.255.128. You give the nt box a
static address of 206.40.43.17. No problem there. The PM should proxy
arp for that address. 206.40.44.160/27 is a valid subnet, and you want to
route that to the NT box. I have similar setups, though NT isn't involved
in them.
flaboy Password = "UNIX"
User-Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-Address = 205.229.48.120,
Login-Host = 205.229.48.17,
Framed-Route = "205.229.53.32/28 0.0.0.0 1"
Our PM is 205.229.48.10 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0. You probably
have a typo somewhere in your settings.
You're not giving the nt box a static address from inside the PM's
assigned pool of addresses, are you? I don't think that's "recommended".
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message.
Florida Digital Turnpike |
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______