> I have posted a couple of questions on NT routing to the list with little
> to no reply. Let me tell you what I am doing.
Hrm... just wondering what that says about the list, about NT in general,
etc... (just a comment)
> I have a pm2er with LAN address 206.40.43.0 netmask 255.255.255.128
> so I am using half of a class C.
> Now I route an NT off of that box using an address off my ethernet
> as the NT's WAN address, for example 206.40.43.17.
> This routes to a subnet 206.40.44.160 255.255.255.224.
>
> Is this legal?
Should work. As to whether its legal or not...
> I have this working in 2 locations, but am having problems in a 3rd
> location. Livingston says its improper routing.
Hrm, probably because you need a local address for the NT box NOT in the
local subnet?
> So instead of using the LAN address I tried using a totally different
> address as the NT's WAN address say 206.40.46.97 255.255.255.240 for
> example. This also causes problems with the box.
>
> What happens is the NT calls in and creates its routes.
> Then next caller calls in and is allocated the same ptp that the NT is on,
Why does the next caller get the same ptp?
> so if I do a sh ro, I see the 2 routes that the NT had moved to ether0,
> and the new caller has his routes going to ptp21, which is the connection
> for the NT. Doent make sense , does it?
Have you looked into using proxy addressing so only the NT box has a real
ip address and it gives fake ip addresses to the local net that it is
routing for? Or do you need REAL ip addresses?
> If anyone has seen this
problem, please let me know. >
> Don
>
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~