Re: Portmaster Problem Still.

Kyle Platts (kwplat1@reliant.uswc.uswest.com)
Sat, 5 Apr 97 12:30:58 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Christopher Hicks: "Re: Ascend Fixed"
Previous message: David Davies: "Radius beta bug ?"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Arnold: "Portmaster Problem Still."
Next in thread: Damien T.: "Re: Portmaster Problem Still."

Details :
After a set debug 0x51 I can watch the TelCo switch get farther =
and
farther behind the livingston in sequences. For example :
Livingston Sends Sequence 201
TelCo Responds Sequence 168! ( actual numbers )
Looking at W1 :
Abort Errors 40
crc errors 9

I reboot machine :
Livingston Sends Sequence 141
TelCo Responds Sequence 131
Looking at W1 :
Abort Errors 89
crc errors 17
frame errors 0/1

The sequence numbers are totally unrelated to each other. There is =
a sequence number in the router and a different sequence number in =
the switch. My IRX-112 I have in the lab is currently at 255 for =
the router and 134 from the switch.

Kyle Platts
CSS-Tech
!NTERPRISE Networking Services=

Next message: Christopher Hicks: "Re: Ascend Fixed"
Previous message: David Davies: "Radius beta bug ?"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Arnold: "Portmaster Problem Still."
Next in thread: Damien T.: "Re: Portmaster Problem Still."