Re: ISPs in trouble? (fwd)
doc (doc@LAME.org)
Tue, 12 Nov 1996 14:08:24 -0500 (EST)
>
> > Bet that Pacific Bell Internet doesn't pay the same prices for incoming lines
> > and such nor suffer the same delays that the rest of us do when attempting to
> > obtain service from Pacific Bell. They aren't competing directly with the
> > rest of their customers. They aren't using internal pricing advantages on
> > circuits to price the rest of their customers out of existance. THAT's the
> > definition of anti-trust last I looked.
>
> Right, can you have a case you can try to pursue. What I was talking
> about is if the FCC and/or RBOC's charge us more because we are ISP's we
> will have a case as well. They are not doing that (yet) and I don't know
> if they will be able to. PacBell should have tarriffs placed on them
> requarding how they operate their ISP service.
It's even worse here in Cincinnati, where the same guy we deal with
for large accounts and ordering things like PRI's is also one of the
lead account rep's for FUSE, Cincinnati Bell's ISP service. :-(
How's -that- for a conflict of interest?
>
> -Matt
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Delete, Ph.D. (doc@NetWare.is.LaMe.ORG) ---------------------------
"You can't understand the user's mind" --------------------------------
"But try with your books and degrees" ---------------------------------
"If you let yourself go and open your mind" ---------------------------
"I bet you'd be doing like me.... and it ain't so bad" ----------------
Alice In Chains, "Dirt", "Junkhead (track 7)" -------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------