I would propose that the numbering be on a per card basis, with a separate
higher level mib per card. For example, say that .1.1.1-96 is card one
usernames, then .1.2.1-96 would be card two usernames. Same with session
ids, retrains, renegs, etc etc.
This would greatly aid ISPSs in monitoring their Pm4's with mrtg and such
on a per card basis. Thoughts?
-- Jeff Carneal - Sys Admin - Apex Internet jeff@apex.net http://www.apex.net (502) 442-5363The opinions expressed above aren't really mine. They belong to someone else who also refuses to take responsibility for them.
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>