> Can you ellaborate a bit?
>
> Why is the PM-3 only "so so"?
It's because code that at one time worked great if not better than other
NASes for semi-v90 is now having problems. This is with the 3.8x builds.
Personally, I lean to blaming the modem manufacturers. Many USR Winmodems
have 5/98 firmware which predates the Sept 1998 ratification...
Elsewise, if I have MZ's permission I'll bounce a message he sent to
isp-tech... hmm well you can view the archives at www.isp-tech.com and
look for "Re: Feedback on USR Total Control" dated Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999
21:11:25 -0800 (PST)
;)
> On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Roy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > "The grass is greener on the other side"???
> >
> > Given that Lucent bought Ascend you might want to definitely check out
> > Cisco.
> >
> > I am getting fed up with Lucent/Livingston myself. Gave up on Ascend a
> > long time ago. The PM-2 was a good box, the PM-3 is so so. Quality of
> > support is declining and new software release are very slow.
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood Got Clue? If so: ISPF! The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>