Re: (PM) looking for opinions - PM3

Roy (garlic@garlic.com)
Sun, 14 Feb 1999 21:00:40 -0800

IMHO

The PM-2 was a great box that was head and shoulders above the others

The PM-3 isn't. I am not saying its very bad but its not the clear
winner. I had expected a better unit.

I am not impressed by their Java based tools either. They are slow and
I can't use them on my UNIX boxes (no X installed).

"Scott P. Daffron" wrote:
>
> Can you ellaborate a bit?
>
> Why is the PM-3 only "so so"?
>
> -Scott
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Roy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > "The grass is greener on the other side"???
> >
> > Given that Lucent bought Ascend you might want to definitely check out
> > Cisco.
> >
> > I am getting fed up with Lucent/Livingston myself. Gave up on Ascend a
> > long time ago. The PM-2 was a good box, the PM-3 is so so. Quality of
> > support is declining and new software release are very slow.
> >
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>