Re: (PM) No answers!

Vernon Burke (vburke@skow.net)
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:03:54 -0000

Um, CT1's have all 24 channels available for use. PRI's are
the only type that loses one channel per for signalling. The
phone co is not "using" the last modem, they use the last channel
for signalling so it isnt available.

CT1=24 channels/lines

PRI= 23 channels/lines

Vern

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Coleman <stevec@mtinter.net>
To: Shawn Ring <shawn@integrityonline.com>;
<portmaster-users@livingston.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: (PM) No answers!

>Shawn Ring wrote:
>
>> I have PM3s using channelized T1s. I am experiencing, to often
to ignore,
>> problems where a customer will dial in and get no answer. It ill just
>> remain silent, not even a ring. I have plenty of lines ready to except
the
>> calls. I see them close to fill up every night. But this problem
happens
>> anytime during the day and I have PM3s available. Could this be a telco
>> issue, or are the PM3s just not answering?
>>
>> I am also finding 2 portmasters with a bad modem. I have put in
"set m32
>> off" to busy the bad ones out (neither of them are m32, I am just using
>> this one as an example), will that cause the issue in the first
paragraph?
>>
>> Thank you ahead of time for your help!!
>
>Hi Shawn,
> Same equip, same problems. It's been consistant through 3
ComOS's. It
>has to be a modem/telco thing. I get the same thing from home now and then,
it takes
>me a couple of tries to get the handshake.
>
>Don't forget, with the channelized T1's, each T1 has one modem/line that is
used by
>the telco (at least thats what they tell me). So, with 2 T1's with 48
modems, you will
>only have 46 modems availible for callers.
>
>We have a great relationship with the local telco engineers. They can't
find anything
>on their end, either. We have a wide range of new and old lines. We set up
computers
>here in the office and they get 52000 connects, take the computer home and
get 28800.
>
>One of our techs was getting 52000 consistantly. He moved 5 miles closer to
the CO but
>now is lucky to get 26000. We have one little hollow that can't even get a
dialtone on
>a modem though their phones work fine. The modems connect fine when they
bring them
>in(figure that one out, I'll buy you a present) :).
>
>Last night, I switched my primary PM from 3.8.2 back to 3.8., now people
who have
>never had a problem, are calling in with "can't establish a network
connection" error.
>
>I can't get connections with Rockwell, Xircom, and numerous other modems.
I've tried
>all the init string tricks that have been posted here on the Rockwell,
nothing works.
>We have figured out that any modem that has dual drivers, flex/v90, will
not connect
>to our PM's. They all get the "can't establish a network connection" error.
>
>I don't know what else to do other than give our users the LTWinmodem at
cost. This is
>the only modem that has no problems. But even with it, it's all according
to the phone
>lines between the user and the CO, on what kind of connect they get.
>
>Steve
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>