Re: (PM) Two weeks later, and still no working ComOS

Andrew Doolittle (andy@livingston.com)
Wed, 22 Jul 1998 14:11:42 -0700

At 05:06 PM 7/18/98 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:

< stuff deleted - I hope I got the attribution right 8-) >

>The PM3 is a small handy thing and in comparison is very cheap. The
>ComOS needs a complete redesign to keep up with current NetWorkManagement
>needs (Remote configuration etc) but the modem code seems to be the worsest
>of all the above.

*Please* explain the statement about network management. As the
responsible party for network management here at RABU, I do not take
statements like that lightly.

>BTW: USR has the same problem currently with support for the old NetServer.
>No feature requests and bugfixes get through same with the PM3 currently.
>So i think ill go for an used Max4k.
>
>Flo
>--
>Florian Lohoff flo@mini.gt.owl.de +49-5241-470566
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
andy
++++

NOC Advocate andy@livingston.com
Lucent Technologies, Remote Access Business Unit (510)737-2151
4464 Willow Road http://www.livingston.com
Pleasanton, CA 94588 http://www.lucent.com
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>