>On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Mia's Virtual Post Office wrote:
>
>> 206.190.23.192 27 206.190.23.216 local NL 1 ether0
>> 0.0.0.0 0 209.190.23.193 local NS 1 Unknown
> ^
> /|\
> |
>This one looks like a typo. You told the PM3 to set the default
>route to 209.190.23.193 but didn't give it a route to that
>address. I think that this should be 206.190.23.193 instead.
>Since that is a directly connected network the PM3 can find it.
>
>As for fixing, if I am right in you wanting to use a default
>route of 206.190.23.193, use set gateway 206.190.23.193.
Yep a typo.. duh.. thanx..
>
>
>> 2. I recently delagated a block of 24IPs off of our subnet to a colo
>> machine running its own primary and secondary DNS. The customer cannot
>> ping the IPs that I have delagated. As a matter of fact the pinging of
>Are the IP's actually in use? You can delegate a block of IP's
>but unless there is an interface to respond to pings you won't
>get anything back.
>
>> IPs on our subnet problem starts at the address that the new PM3 is on.
>
>You lost me on this last sentance. It may just be lack of
>caffeine thought. :)
Basically, I thought that perhaps my problem with my idiotic typo caused
every other IP beyond it to not respond to pings. However there is only
one box on any of the IPs beyond the PM3 in question. The PM3 is at
206.190.23.216 and I have a colo server on 206.190.23.231 thru
254(delegated a 0/24). The customer complains that he cannot ping
206.190.23.231, which is where the unit is located. I thought perhaps I
had goofed somthing in my router, and lost 206.190.23.216 thru 254,
however it was the typo. Anyway, the only thing I can figure is that the
customer has not configured his TCP/IP stack correctly? Anyway the colo
server is running both Primary and Secondary DNS, with 3rd.beethoven.net
on 206.190.23.231 and 9th.beethoven.net on 206.190.23.254. I cannot
seem to ping any of these IPs, yet nslookup of 3rd.beethoven.net returns
the 206.190.23.231 address. However if I nslookup 206.190.23.231 I get
host not found. I'm lost, all I can think of is that TCP/IP stack on the
customers machine. (I have not looked at that yet)
I hope this is less confusing... I like the rest of you , don't get much
sleep..
Thanx again..
jer
>
>> These problems could be related? I am stumped and really need some help.
>
>The first one looks like a typo. The second not sure.
>
>Michael
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Michael J. Hartwick, VE3SLQ
>Prime-Line Communications
>hartwick@primeline.net
>
Ameritech, Our Link To Disaster
"On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and
Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony." And Windows98 Crashed!
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>