Re: (PM) SLC Series-5 -> PM2E (fwd)
Don Lashier (dl@newportnet.com)
Sun, 21 Jun 1998 13:08:40 -0700
On 6/21/98, at 8:54 AM, Russ Taylor wrote:
>On 6/21/98 1:46 AM, MegaZone (megazone@megazone.org) wrote
>>The telco is under NO obligation to improve this connection if they have
>>it setup as above. It provides the service they are obligated to=
provide,
>>and does so quite effectively. This happens a lot in areas with rapid
>>growth. They can't bring in trunks fast enough, and MUXing doubles
>>capacity immediately.
>
>If the telco sells internet and provides better quality lines to itself,
>is there room for a complaint there? Seems like a nice big, fat CofI.
If it's on the client end, and it normally is, it'll affect the
telco customers too.
Don
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don Lashier dl@newportnet.com
Newport Internet http://www.newportnet.com/
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>