Re: (PM) ether0 ?

Lanham Rattan (lanham@montrose.net)
Sat, 10 Jan 1998 13:26:41 -0700

OK, can you give my any ideas about this route statement...this is happening
at random to my dial-up customers. They are connected but since the Metric
is 16 and the Interface is not known then they cannot _see_ the internet.

204.133.195.239 32 204.133.195.239 local HLCO 16 Unknown

Thanks,

Lanham.

-----Original Message-----
From: Todd R. Eigenschink <eigenstr@mixi.net>
To: Lanham Rattan <lanham@montrose.net>
Date: Saturday, January 10, 1998 12:22 PM
Subject: (PM) ether0 ?

>Lanham Rattan writes:
>>Is having 2 ether0 Interface routes an error?
>
>You don't actually have to ether0 interfaces; that's the listing of
>what interface that route will *use*. That is, where the traffic will
>go.
>
>
>>portmaster1> show route
>>Destination Mask Gateway Source Flag Met Interface
>>----------------- ---- -------------------- ------- ---- --- ---------
>>0.0.0.0 0 204.133.195.2 local NS 1 ether0
>>204.133.195.230 32 204.133.195.230 local HL 1 ptp31
>>204.133.195.196 32 204.133.195.196 local HL 1 ptp8
>>[..]
>>204.133.195.0 24 204.133.195.11 local NL 1 ether0
>
>
>
>Todd
>--
>Todd R. Eigenschink Midwest Internet Exchange, Inc.
>eigenstr@mixi.net http://www.mixi.net/
>System Administrator (219) 459-2521

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.