Re: (PM) ether0 ?

Tom Fellenz (tlf@livingston.com)
Sat, 10 Jan 1998 12:32:09 -0800

At 01:26 PM 1/10/98 -0700, Lanham Rattan wrote:
>OK, can you give my any ideas about this route statement...this is happening
>at random to my dial-up customers. They are connected but since the Metric
>is 16 and the Interface is not known then they cannot _see_ the internet.
>
>204.133.195.239 32 204.133.195.239 local HLCO 16 Unknown

H = Host
L = Local
C = Changed
O = Obsoleted (route no longer active - timing out -
a new routing update is required within 120 seconds to keep it)

Unknown = no interface associated with the route - not active

Tom

>
>Thanks,
>
>Lanham.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Todd R. Eigenschink <eigenstr@mixi.net>
>To: Lanham Rattan <lanham@montrose.net>
>Date: Saturday, January 10, 1998 12:22 PM
>Subject: (PM) ether0 ?
>
>
>>Lanham Rattan writes:
>>>Is having 2 ether0 Interface routes an error?
>>
>>You don't actually have to ether0 interfaces; that's the listing of
>>what interface that route will *use*. That is, where the traffic will
>>go.
>>
>>
>>>portmaster1> show route
>>>Destination Mask Gateway Source Flag Met Interface
>>>----------------- ---- -------------------- ------- ---- --- ---------
>>>0.0.0.0 0 204.133.195.2 local NS 1 ether0
>>>204.133.195.230 32 204.133.195.230 local HL 1 ptp31
>>>204.133.195.196 32 204.133.195.196 local HL 1 ptp8
>>>[..]
>>>204.133.195.0 24 204.133.195.11 local NL 1 ether0
>>
>>
>>
>>Todd
>>--
>>Todd R. Eigenschink Midwest Internet Exchange, Inc.
>>eigenstr@mixi.net http://www.mixi.net/
>>System Administrator (219) 459-2521
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.