Re: (PM) OR-u sync port on-demand dial-out-only woes. (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Sun, 30 Nov 1997 00:35:04 -0800 (PST)

Once upon a time Samudra E. Haque shaped the electrons to say...
>If we were to "force" the reported IP to a single one, WHICH ONE should
>we set it to?

It doesn't matter. It could even be a completely different one.

>And how would the routing tables w.r.t. to the end-user be setup ?

The reported_ip is only seen by the client PPP peer. Instead of the
PM's IP address, that is what they see as the other end.

>would users dialling into PM3 be given the PM1 as the reported IP ?
>Would
>the IP packets first go from PM3 to PM1 and then out the subnet ?

No, the ethernet doesn't know, nor care, that reported_ip is being used.
Nothing changes.

-MZ

--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.