(PM) Does Radius 2.01 have memory leak

Douglas Semonche (semonche@nic.com)
Sat, 29 Nov 1997 12:46:03 -0500 (EST)

A while ago someone posted that Radius 2.01
had a memory leak (with a patch).

I'm currently using a third party radius
but want to change to livingston to get
the Connect-info (speed) check item.

Has the memory leak been fixed (if
it did exist)?

I like to run radiusd in non-forking
mode - somewhere I got the idea that
with a dbm users directory that was
more efficient than forking,
but if radusd keeps growing
obviously I don't want to do that.
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.