> A while ago someone posted that Radius 2.01 had a memory leak (with a
> patch).
>
> I'm currently using a third party radius but want to change to
> livingston to get the Connect-info (speed) check item.
>
> Has the memory leak been fixed (if it did exist)?
It is being fixed in the next version of Radius. It occurs with multiple
DEFAULT entries in non-forking mode I believe.
> I like to run radiusd in non-forking mode - somewhere I got the idea
> that with a dbm users directory that was more efficient than forking,
> but if radusd keeps growing obviously I don't want to do that.
Why run it in non-forking mode? It runs great in normal mode.
- Steve
- Systems Manager
- Community Internet Access, Inc.
- Gallup and Grants, New Mexico
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.