Re: (PM) ether0 not responding... (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Sun, 23 Nov 1997 02:27:36 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jason Nealis: "Re: (PM) Here is a list of the vulnerable OS's From Aleph One on BugTraq FW: "LAND" Attack Update (f"
Previous message: MegaZone: "(PM) Here is a list of the vulnerable OS's From Aleph One on BugTraq FW: "LAND" Attack Update (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: MegaZone: "(PM) ether0 not responding... (fwd)"

Once upon a time Allan Worley shaped the electrons to say...
>Which is better... It seems like the default is .0 If all my other boxes are
>using .255 shouldn't the PM?

You want all the boxes on an ethernet using the same broadcast addr.

-MZ

--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.

Next message: Jason Nealis: "Re: (PM) Here is a list of the vulnerable OS's From Aleph One on BugTraq FW: "LAND" Attack Update (f"
Previous message: MegaZone: "(PM) Here is a list of the vulnerable OS's From Aleph One on BugTraq FW: "LAND" Attack Update (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: MegaZone: "(PM) ether0 not responding... (fwd)"