Re: Error saving configuration? (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Sun, 31 Aug 1997 19:55:33 -0700 (PDT)

Once upon a time Stefan Hudson shaped the electrons to say...
>me save the config. I still need to get more memory, tho... is parity really
>required?

That's what the HW Guide says - and I don't know otherwise. Haven't tried
non-parity myself.

>I have 3 netblock assigned to me. I've added them all to the 0.0.0.0 area.
>Is this what I want to do, if I'm only using one area?

Oh. Yeah, I believe that's what you'd want to do so that all machines can
participate.

>It's a static IP. Dialup network assignments also appear this way, as do the
>routes that the Cisco converts from RIP. Pool assignments do not have /E2
>listed. Everything works fine, I'm just wondering what it means.

Just the way the OSPF code works. I think it is because the route is
external to the LAN, and I believe it also means less computation on the
routing tables each time a route is added/dropped.

>Also, any idea why Ascend dynamic bandwidth allocation doesn't work on the
>Livingston? I'm calling from a Pipeline 25, and if I call a PM3, it never gr

It is probably trying to use MP+, which is a non-standard Ascend system. I
know you can get a Pipeline to make a two channel connection to a PM, but I
don't know how myself. I think we may have a technote on it on the website.

-MZ

--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588