This was the problem. I turned off RIP, waited for the routes to expire and
be replaced by their OSPF equivilant (a Cisco is converting them), and it let
me save the config. I still need to get more memory, tho... is parity really
required?
> >sure if I have it set up right. I'm just using one area (0.0.0.0), so should
> >I add all of my netblocks to that area? I did, but I'm getting a few entries
>
> I'm not sure what you are asking...
I have 3 netblock assigned to me. I've added them all to the 0.0.0.0 area.
Is this what I want to do, if I'm only using one area?
> >206.40.79.221 32 206.40.79.11 ospf/E2 HDC 2 ether0
> >The E2 appears to mean that it's an "external" link... but the 206.40.79.0/24
> >network is in the 0.0.0.0 area. So what's external about it? There are a few
>
> Can't say without knowing that 206.40.79.221/32 is - part of a pool? A user
> with a static IP?
It's a static IP. Dialup network assignments also appear this way, as do the
routes that the Cisco converts from RIP. Pool assignments do not have /E2
listed. Everything works fine, I'm just wondering what it means.
Also, any idea why Ascend dynamic bandwidth allocation doesn't work on the
Livingston? I'm calling from a Pipeline 25, and if I call a PM3, it never grabs
a second channel, even if the bandwidth usage requires it. The same connection
works correctly when connecting to an Ascend 400T. I can connect with two
channels to the PM3 if I force it to always use 2 channels, so I don't think it's
a maximum channel limit. It seems like the Ascend never even attempts to aquire
the second channel when connected to the livingston.
--
/// Stefan Hudson <hudson@mbay.net>
__ /// Senior Network Administrator - Monterey Bay Internet
\\\/// http://www.mbay.net/ - Email: info@mbay.net
\XX/ Voice: 408-642-6100 Fax: 408-642-6101 Modem: 408-642-6102