Re: Best routing protocol for Livngston (fwd)

Jake Messinger (jake@ams.com)
Wed, 27 Aug 1997 17:55:44 -0500 (CDT)

On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, MegaZone wrote:

> The IRX is more directly comparable, powerwise, to the low end Ciscos. But
> it also uses a fraction of the RAM to do the same job.

THis one of Livingston's strong suits, ability to prevent kernel bloat.
How much ram is required for a USR TC? 16 megs?

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~