Well, and the last which would cause .255 to be issued at the end of the
pool.
>If I then set-assigned to X.X.X.1 with a pool-size of 32 (so "mandated"
>(according to previous posts in this forum) in order to allow OSPF routes
>to be broadcast as a single entry rather than multiple host routes), then
No, that won't work. That's NOT an even subnet.
You can't use the first and last subnets with a pools size of 32.
>subnet boundary or the subnet boundary +1), the PM will at some point
>assign an IP address which is the network/broadcast IP of the next/current
That doesn't matter- you are not really subnetting. OSPF doesn't care.
-MZ
-- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588