> If I then set-assigned to X.X.X.1 with a pool-size of 32 (so "mandated"
> (according to previous posts in this forum) in order to allow OSPF routes
Why would you set a pool size of 32? You have a 32 port pm 3?
> to be broadcast as a single entry rather than multiple host routes), then
> the PM could potentially assign X.X.X.32 to a user and I wouldn't be able
> to set-assigned X.X.X.32 (pool-size 32) on the next PM in the same Class
> C.
>
> For that matter, setting a pool-size to 32 is confusing since no matter
> which .224 subnet one uses or where one starts in the subnet (i.e. on the
> subnet boundary or the subnet boundary +1), the PM will at some point
> assign an IP address which is the network/broadcast IP of the next/current
> subnet.
That was MY first thought...
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger 713-772-6690 jake@ams.com
Advanced Medical Systems, Inc. jake@uh.edu
8300 Bissonnet #400
Houston, Texas 77074 http://www.ams.com/~jake
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~