Well, all I can say is we disagree on interpretation. We do not agree that
the wording of the RFC requires a NAS to support it on all interfaces to
be RFC compliant - and remember, Brian Lloyd, one of the RFC authors, works
for Livingston now.
The RFC only indicates that a NAS *can* do such, not that it must - that is
how we read it. Also note that Ascend also had MP on ISDN only (I think
thye recently added itto modems too), and I believe Cisco did (maybe still
does). This is not an interpretation we are alone in making.
I am sorry for the confusion.
>this year). Anyway, here's the reference to the PM3 FAQ that states that
>the PM3 supports 33.6's. Megazone, if you have any influence over the
>changing of this misleading online information, can you see what you can
>do?
>
>http://www.livingston.com/Marketing/Products/pm3qa.shtml#13
>
>. . . .
>Q. Does the PM3 support 33.6Kbps modem?
>
>A. Yes.
I'll see about yanking that.
-MZ
-- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588