First you did check the archives first right?
hmm, guess not.
Livingston's position is that the M$ implementation of traceroute aka
tracert is not to standard, as such older implementations for ComOS will
not respond to it. Look at the notes for ComOS 3.5.1b20 I believe, and
you'll find that Livingston has added the feature to it to allow tracert
to work like you think it should.
> With "any" Win95 and WinNT system I have connected to it, I get the following:
>
> When I do a traceroute to 203.24.16.1 I get:
[snip]
Don't take this as a snotty response, but people really should check the
archives first and do a little research...
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood