Re: (PM) OSPF Again (fwd)

Andrzej Stella-Sawicki (savit@sav.net)
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 01:00:00 +0100 (MET)

Once upon a time Chris Edwards shaped the electrons to say...

> Framed-IP-Address = 209.42.162.5,
> Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.252,
> Framed-Route ="209.42.162.4/30 209.42.162.5 1",

AFAIK this Framed-Route is not needed in this case, because the
netmask covers this routing on framed interface. Framed-Route would make
sense if you would like to route additional network (not covered by
netmask) for this customer like:

Framed-IP-Address = 209.42.162.5,
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.252,
Framed-Route = "209.42.162.128/25 209.42.162.5 1"

In this case routing 209.42.162.4/30 is automaticaly created to
this customer's interface and additionally second half of above C class is
routed to him too.

Regards

Savit

Andrzej Stella-Sawicki <Savit@Sav.NET>, <savit@altavista.pl>
Polbox Sp. z o.o. http://www.polbox.pl/

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>