>
> The issue I have is that there in no Radius 2.1... I can't use the beta
> because I need to modify the source. How is support@livingston supposed
> to help me on that issue?
#define VERSION "Livingston RADIUS 2.1b6 1998/08/31"
Uhm, I got that from the website, IIRC... ewps nope from FTP.
BSDOS_3.0> ls
Makefile conf.h log.o pass.o radiusd.o
version.c acct.o dict.o md5.o proxy.o
users.h version.o builddbm* ipass.o menu.o
radius.h users.o vports.o builddbm.o iradiusd*
pass.c radiusd* util.o
which is from: radius21b6.tar
ftp://ftp.livingston.com/pub/livingston/software/
Now you can find it and play with it ;)
> While the Java people are doing nice things and releasing all sorts of
> code, Lucent says "not ready yet" on fixing problems in Radius 2.1,
> COMOS 3.7.2 for the PM2, and 3.8.2 for the PM3. Maybe some reallocation
> of resources is called for?
I asked about this and it's not a matter of reallocation, it's more on
being able to hire people who can do the work. LRABU constantly is
looking for people, but it's a matter of getting the right people in the
door.
> In the notes below, someone was thinking about betting his business by
> switching to a FIVE MONTH old beta. I was recommending against that. A
> conclusion that one might draw is that Radius 2.1 is a very broken piece
> of code that they couldn't fix in five months.
Or there was an issue with a specific section, that wouldn't impact most
uses, BUT that issue means that it cannot be considered a final. 8\
Looking at much of the programs out, it makes you wonder how win98 is
_not_ a beta...
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood Got Clue? If so: ISPF! The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>