> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Richard
> Morrell
> Sent: 10 February 1999 17:12
> To: James Courtier-Dutton
> Cc: Portmaster Mailing List
> Subject: RE: (PM) Portmaster 3 / ISDN problem and errors...
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>
> > ComOS 3.8.2 should and does (as far as I know) work on any PRI
> which worked
> > with ComOS 3.7.2c3
>
> Bzzzt. Wrong answer. ComOS 3.8 introduced a bug in the way that certain
> PRI D-channel synchronisation situations are handled on ETSI PRI. AFAIK,
> there was no change to the PRI code in ComOS 3.8.2 (according to our
> distributors, the ComOS 3.8.2 release notes and everyone I've talked to at
> Lucent).
>
> > But ComOS 3.8.2 should have fixed that.
>
> But it didn't. The main difference between ComOS 3.8 and 3.8.2 is the way
> in which it handles the situation. ComOS 3.8 just brings the PRI up and
> down to try and clear the problem (which it doesn't succeed in doing,
> requiring manual intravention). ComOS 3.8.2 just reboots itself when it
> gets into trouble (someone from Switzerland could get one of his to reboot
> just by doing a "show S??").
>
> James, you didn't include a sig but from your email address I take it that
> you work for Livingston in the UK? Do you know if they are any closer to
> releasing a fix for this?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Richard Morrell
> richard@ednet.co.uk
> System Administrator - edNET: Internet Access for Edinburgh -
> www.ednet.co.uk
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>