Vern
----- Original Message -----
From: John Storms <jstorms@livingston.com>
To: <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 7:22 PM
Subject: RE: (PM) What ever happened to?
>The next release for the PM2, PM25, IRX, OR, and PM3 will be 3.9.
>
>At 10:00 AM 2/4/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>This closed beta is for what product? I have been looking for 3.8 (or
>>higher) for my PM2 products ever since I saw secondary ether addressing.
>>Here in Bell Canada Land, BRI is cheaper bu $15 per ch per mo then PRI so
we
>>use PM2's and USR MP8I's. They are a little bit more administratively but
>>much cheaper to provide here.
>>
>>However, this means that me and my PM2's are married for a few more years
>>and I am concerned about the lack of software upgrades. I hope to see 3.8
or
>>3.9 real soon. If there is a beta, I am interested.
>>
>>>There is a closed beta, I believe it to be ComOS 3.9b5. Let me know if
you
>>>want to get on the program.
>>>
>>>Adrian Rowley, Know-Ware UK Ltd
>>>Tel: 01252 734023 Mobile: 07970 405133
>>>Sales Tel: 0117 904 7763 Fax: 0117 923 2219
>>>Support Tel: 01684 290328 Fax: 01684 290284
>>>http://www.knowware.co.uk
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
>>>[mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Richard
>>>Morrell
>>>Sent: 04 February 1999 13:13
>>>To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
>>>Subject: Re: (PM) What ever happened to?
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jake Messinger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Im getting discouraged. I havent seen any upgrades for the pm 2, irx,
or
>>>> OR series for over a year. The OR series is in DIRE need of an upgrade
to
>>>> be competitive.
>>>
>>>You're not the only one. Grumble, grumble, ComOS 3.8 E1 PRI bug, moan,
>>>moan, been broken for over two months now, harp, harp.
>>>
>>>Anyway, I had some bodies in from Lucent recently and they asked me why I
>>>was selling 761s instead of ORs. When I told them why (overpriced and
>>>lacking features) they said that there was a beta version of the software
>>>for the OR (is it ComOS?) that did NAT. Can anyone confirm this?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Richard Morrell
>>>richard@ednet.co.uk
>>>System Administrator - edNET: Internet Access for Edinburgh -
>>>www.ednet.co.uk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>>>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>>>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>>
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>>>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>>>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>
>>
>
>---
>jstorms@lucent.com (Galactic Hero)
>Diplomacy: The art of saying good doggie
>while seaching for a big rock.
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>