Re: (PM) PM3 OSPF problemo

Russell Heilling (russellh@netdirect.net.uk)
Wed, 29 Jul 1998 15:37:25 +0100

It looks like you have set an assigned address as xxx.yyy.zzz.1 with
a pool-size of 62, if you want it to advertise the /26 you need to
set the assigned to xxx.yyy.zzz.0 with a pool size of 64, it will
assign .0 as a host but will handle it (unlike USR TC racks which
barf on the .0)
---
Russell Heilling   -   Technical Manager   -   NetDirect Internet Ltd
Tel: +441812937000 email:russellh@netdirect.net.uk Fax: +441812936000
   "That which doesn't kill you will make you bitter and cynical"


-----Original Message-----
From: Sami Laine <lane@netti.fi>
To: <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
Date: 29 July 1998 14:20
Subject: (PM) PM3 OSPF problemo


>Hello,
>
>I have a small, but annoying, problemo with PM3 and OSPF. When user
>dials in, host route (or subnet if needed) is injected to routing
>tables correctly and at the same time PM3 announces following routes
>too:
>
>xxx.yyy.zzz.1/255.255.255.255
>xxx.yyy.zzz.60/255.255.255.254
>xxx.yyy.zzz.2/255.255.255.254
>xxx.yyy.zzz.56/255.255.255.252
>xxx.yyy.zzz.4/255.255.255.252
>xxx.yyy.zzz.48/255.255.255.248
>xxx.yyy.zzz.8/255.255.255.248
>xxx.yyy.zzz.32/255.255.255.240
>xxx.yyy.zzz.16/255.255.255.240
>
>This doesn't actually break anything, I'd love to see only host routes
>(or even better, summary route for xxx.yyy.zzz.0/26).
>
>The real question is: how to force route summarization in portmaster
>OSPF implementation?
>
>Thanks.
>
>-- 
>Sami Laine
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>


-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>