I am in germany too and for me KFlex works only on half of the users
willing to do ... and even those have to redial 3-4 time to get a stable
connect.
> So I still don't understand what your major problem is. Ok, you want V.90.
> But V.90 is not an official standard yet. You want K56flex. But K56flex
> *does* work on the PM3. If it absolutely does not for you then it is
> probably your telco (Deutsche Telekom? yuck).
It doesnt matter if V.90 is a standard. Ascend and USR hardware can already
do it and every provider chosen a different hardware then Livingston
is able to do V.90 at the moment.
> But I do agree that the quality of the product seems to be declining with
> time. Our first PM3 (an original Livingston one) was working just fine
> since day 1 with all software revisions I tried (except 3.8b17 which was
> beta, so it doesn't count). Two units that we got later had hardware
> problems (one we still have, still not sure if it is the modem card or the
> hardware itself), we replaced one. Also software updates seem to be
> lagging behind greatly and yes, I'm upset too that I have to wait for PM3
> software to be finished first, before I get new software for our PM2's
> (OSPF over dialup for backup purposes, anyone? - Lucent, *please*
> release new software for PM2's, too).
Since 3.8b13 all betas had been rebooting for me every 24-48 hours.
Modem code went much worser in b17 for me so i am stuck with an old
beta not capable of a bit V.90.
Flo
-- Florian Lohoff flo@mini.gt.owl.de +49-5241-470566 - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>