Re: (PM) PM3 opinions

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Fri, 10 Jul 1998 11:12:27 -0600

On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 01:49:16PM -0400, Chris Chapman wrote:

> I haven't used a Portmaster since the 2er with 30 serial ports and I
> wanted an alternative to Ascend gear along with some real world opinions
> on a PM3. We would like a Portmaster 3 to serve the following functions.

It'll be a great choice.

> - Terminate a PRI for ISDN and v.90 dialin (24 modems).
> - Terminate a Point to Point T1 for IP traffic between a remote office
> and the POP.
> - Route IP traffic between the modems, the LAN, and the remote office.
> (Internet traffic from the modems and remote office will be sent to a
> seperate router on the LAN through the portmaster).

No problem.

>
> Internet <---->LAN<------
> |
> v
> 1 or 2 PRIs for dialin<----> Portmaster <--->PtP T1 from remote office
>
>
> Also, if at a later date we need to add 24 more modems, is our
> expandability shot by using the internal CSUs for the PtP T1 and PRI? If
> we can add 24 more modems, could it handle the load for 48 sessions and
> routing the PtP T1?

Use the add-on T1 card in the 6th modem slot (so only use something like 5
10-MDM cards)... then it can handle two CT1/PRI's and 48 modems and a full
T1 to another site.

> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thnaks
>
> Chris Chapman
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

-- 
 - Steve
  - Systems Manager
  - Community Internet Access, Inc.
  - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>