2 facts you may want to consider which break your argument, data
compression and latency.....
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
NetRom Internet Services 973-208-1339 voice
john@netrom.com 973-208-0942 fax
http://www.netrom.com
data lines: (973)208-2536 (973)208-7777 (973)728-1274 (973)835-1111
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, 5 Jul 1998, Paul S. Carlson wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jul 1998, I don't work for Lucent RABU wrote:
> >
> > > Wouldn't 57600 or 115200 be a better port rate? You may get overruns if
> > > you set it to 38400...
> >
> > If flow control is enabled, then you shouldnt get overruns, but yes, if
> > the modems can talk 115200, you should set the ports to 115200.
>
> I wouldn't be so quick about it. Many modems claiming to be 115200
> capable just can't deal with it very well. I usually set my port speeds
> based on what the sustained transfer rate might be and stay away from
> cheaper modems.
>
> A 33.6 modem won't be able to transfer any faster then 57600. (for that
> matter it's unlikly that a 56k modem would get any faster).
>
> Paul - Kuentos
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>