Re: (PM) NAT on a 95 box

Jake Messinger (jake@ams.com)
Mon, 22 Jun 1998 11:24:58 -0500 (CDT)

On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Donn Lasher wrote:

> I played around with every single proxy this weekend, and IMHO, they all suck.
>
> Before all the authors jump me, let me rephrase. All of the others work, in
> varying degrees, but all except two require proxy configuration, etc etc.
> Of the two that don't, firesock doesn't even use Windows DUN, which can be
> a good thing, but in the process loses MPP support, and has no ethernet to
> ethernet support. So, who's the winner?

Firesock is working on ethernet to ethernet support. I thought they had it
by now.

> SyGate - www.sygate.com
>
> No frills, modem to ether, ether to ether, full NAT, works great. Haven't
> priced it out yet, but it just plain works.

Did you ever try out Dave Mischler's ipRoute? We use that for Ethernet to
Ethernet and an OR-U type setup.

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake Business Management
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>