> Please read the previous posts `[8-))
>
> This is about v.34, etc., not v.90.
Okay, When did this whole discussion shift from V.90 to V.34? I didn't
notice V.34 in the original message.
The only people I've seen complaining about V.34 are the folks running
3.8b15.
My point is still pretty much the same: If you're really losing gobs of
money due to modem problems, then buy another product.
Personally, my PM3s run 3.7.2c3, and I'm not seeing any v.34 issues. OF
the different equipment I have here, V.34 actually seems to work best on
my PM3s.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Elfert <brian@citilink.com>
> To: Larry Vaden <vaden@texoma.net>
> Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 1998 10:50 AM
> Subject: Re: (PM) Stable v.90
>
>
> |
> |
> |On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Larry Vaden wrote:
> |
> |> 2,000 ISPs losing $500-$1,500/day on average due to V.34 problems is
> |> probably not a reach `[8-))
> |
> |An ISP would have to be losing 25 to 75 customers A DAY to lose this kind
> |of money.
> |
> |There are many ISPs that would be out of business at the end of a month if
> |they really were losing that many customers due to lack of V.90 support.
> |
> |If I relied only on PM3s, and I was losing that kind of money, I'd buy a
> |product from another company to provide V.90 then.
> |
> |Brian
> |
> |
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>