Re: (PM) V.90 bitching (fwd)

scheb w/pm3's (pm3@integrityonline11.com)
Sat, 13 Jun 1998 15:29:36 -0400

yes, i concur. however, in NJ here (the birthplace of the bell system)
most of the telecom lines here... (um, well-it amazes me that it works...).
anyhow, for my customers, i'm still looking for steady v.34 support (33.6)
and then when v.90 does roll around, i'll deal with it then. ok, and then
my question is, if my customers can't get 33.6, then how can they
automatically jump to 56k?

adam

>At 1:43 -0700 6/13/98, MegaZone wrote:
>>No, we do NOT have a standard protocol. We have a *proposal*. Keep in mind
>>the final standard MAY BE DIFFERENT. No one can say, they may make changes
>>before ratifying the standard.
>
>True, although it's rather rare for ITU standards to change technically
>(commas and fly specks don't count) between being "determined" and being
>ratified. This one could certainly be one of the exceptions, as it
>happened rather rapidly (the "my company first" talks before December
>really don't count for much).
>
> --John (Yes, sometimes a comma changes the technical meaning: THEN it
>counts)
>--
>John Baxter jwblist@olympus.net Port Ludlow, WA, USA
>Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish,
>and you get rid of him for the weekend.
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

--


scheb w/pm3's = pm3@integrityonline11.com


       *************************
       * Ah, F'get about it... *
       *************************






-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>