RE: (PM) v.90 code (fwd)

Mikael Hugo (mikael.hugo@dataphone.net)
Thu, 11 Jun 1998 00:59:41 +0200

I agree with MZ on a technical level.

I also could describe a number of scenarios that would require hardware
fixes, but who cares about nuclear strikes or lightning. Either its
covered by insurance or we wont be around to need the fixes. :)

The Lucent DSP can do what we need it to do for some time, and then we
throw the PMs out and buy new systems.

I would, by the way, probably use noneducated, ignorant, or preferably
misinformed or mistaken. The issue is either way very clear - Making
infected statements makes people throw rotten tomatoes at you. If you
dont like the smell - Move out of range or make it stop another way.

Just dont use the nukes :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy [mailto:garlic@garlic.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 1998 12:24 AM
To: PortMaster Users
Subject: Re: (PM) v.90 code (fwd)

The real dumb thing is calling other people dumb. I can describe a
number of hypothetical failure scenarios which would require hardware
fixes.
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>