Re: (PM) v.90 code

Jim Scott (jscott@infoconex.com)
Tue, 9 Jun 1998 18:43:49 -0700

Do you have multiple PM3's? If so why not dedicate just one of them as a
v.90 server and tell your users to use it as a beta test platform. Offer new
users v.90 access and when they are not able to get a v.90 connect tell them
they can use your other server till v.90 is released as a standard.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy <garlic@garlic.com>
To: portmaster-users@livingston.com <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 09, 1998 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: (PM) v.90 code

>Rather than ragging on the list, I sent a note to the sales department
>with the hope that they had a better path to upper management. The
>short story is
>
>
> 1. Roy said :I am losing customers because of lack of V.90:
>
> 2. Sales said :Try the beta:
>
> 3. Roy said :The beta doesn't work satisfactorily:
>
> 4. Sales said :We will report this to support:
>
> 5. Support said :If the beta gives you problems, back out:
>
> 6. Go to step 1
>
>
>I wonder if there are deep problems in the Lucent V.90 that are not
>software and they are desperate to find a fix that doesn't involve
>recalling every K56FLEX card.
>
>Roy
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>