Once upon a time Patrick Darden shaped the electrons to say...
>I don't think I misunderstood them. They told me to put the pm3s and the
>dialup pools in the same class c. However, the two technicians helping
No need for that at all. It is quite common to run PMs with the ethernet
in one range and the dial pools in another. However, you really should be sure
to use OSPF and NOT RIP in such an environment.
>What are you using on your pools, 255.255.255.192? That seems pretty
You don't assign a mask to the pool, just let OSPF deal with it.
>wasteful. . . . How are you getting around mppp using one channel from
>pm3-1 and another from pm3-2 -- routing-wise, that would seem to be a
>nightmare. I would love to see the configurations from two of your
Why? It is cake. It uses one IP - from the master in the MCPPP session.
There is NOTHING involved in routing. As long as the PMs can see each other.
Now, if you aren't using OSPF - you have my pity.
-MZ
-- <URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, author, webmaster, human being, me "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130 <URL:mailto:megazone@gweep.net> <URL:http://www.megazone.org/> Hail Discordia!- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>