Brantley
At 05:40 PM 5/20/98 -0700, Josh Richards wrote:
>On 20 May 1998, Larry A. Weidig wrote:
>
>> I have a question based on a mail that I just recently saw. I was
>> under the impression that the STAC compression cards were only useful for
>> ISDN connections and not standard modems, is that true? If so, would the
>> previous mail even matter as he was running channelized T1's with the STAC
>> cards. Thanks for clearing this up for me.
>
>STAC has absolutely no relation or knowledge of what the underlying link
>is. You can run it over POTS, ISDN, CT1, or a tin-can and a string
>(although I'm not aware of any IETF standards covering that last one..)
>;-)
>
>The client software just has to support it. Windows 95/NT supports it
>with the latest updates installed. If you dial in with another router
>such as an OR using the async interface on it, you can do STAC just fine.
>I'm not sure about MacOS. Linux should have some patches that do it, or
>if not it will soon.
>
>-jr
>
>----
>Josh Richards - <jrichard@livingston.com> - <josh@lucent.com>
>[Beta Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies - Remote Access Business Unit
><URL:http://www.livingston.com/> * <URL:http://www.lucent.com/dns/>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>