Re: (PM) DoS attack

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Wed, 25 Feb 1998 21:59:24 -0700

I've RFE'ed this numerous times over the past year (or more?). No feedback
from Livingston other than it's being considered like every other RFE :(

On Wed, Feb 25, 1998 at 12:46:04PM -0500, Stephen Zedalis wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, David Denney wrote:
>
> >It would be nice to have a filter
> >that could be applied onto a dialup port that would block source
> >addresses other that ones assigned to the port without having to
> >have a different filter for each customer.
>
> I agree, this needs an RFE. There ought to be a "magic" value in the
> filter rulesets that equates to the address currently assigned to that
> port/user. That way you can set your rulesets to only permit
> incoming packets with the correct source address(s) for that port. It
> would simplify things alot and allow you to do filtering that currently
> you can only do with static IP assignments and individual filters per
> user.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

-- 
 - Steve
  - Systems Manager
  - Community Internet Access, Inc.
  - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>