At 07:21 PM 2/22/98 -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
>
>..especially since there are *SO* many Ascend Pipelines in use
>
>On Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 11:13:33PM -0500, Christopher Masto wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 05:31:09PM -0800, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
>> > >My point was this: some routers don't require the server to do anything
>> > >special. Some routers have brains and can figure out to add drop
channels
>> > >on their own. Ascend's can't. For those of using LE, Ascend simply
>> > >doesn't work *now*, and therefore has been entirely dropped from my
>> > >acceptable hardware list.
>> >
>> > Which Lucent must think is a bad thing since they *are* adding BACP
support.
>> > Why else would they?
>>
>> It certainly _should_ be a goal to provide work-arounds for their
>> competitors' deficiencies.
>> --
>> Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>
>> Director of Operations, NetMonger Communications, Inc.
>> +1-516-221-6664 http://www.netmonger.net/ info@netmonger.net
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>--
> - Steve
> - Systems Manager
> - Community Internet Access, Inc.
> - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
Kevin
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>