If the location is set to on demand then the routes should not go into a
unknown state, unless the gateway is invalid( the gateway is not directly
connected to the pm ).
the unknown routes will not be sent out, because they are not supported (
invalid gateway ).
routes with supporting ports will go out as external type 2 (if I remember
the livingston implimentation correct). If the routes are going as ext type
2 you can not have the area set to stubby(no eternals in, no externals
out), nssa(externals out, no externals in) will work fine.
>
>
>On Sun, Feb 08, 1998 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>> The Portmaster will announce those when they are needed - active.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 08, 1998 at 10:56:59PM +0100, Juergen Unger wrote:
>> > I've tested OSPF routing from our Portmasters to one of our Ciscos. Works
>> > fine. But one point I am missing: Is it right that the Portmaster only
>> > announces routes that are allready pointing to an active network
>> > interface? What about routes pointing to 'unknown' ? I would like to have
>> > them announced too because they are necessary for customers who get an
>> > dialout from us.
>
>--
>CHOIN! HCT GmbH -- http://www.choin.net
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.