:)
On Wed, Feb 04, 1998 at 01:35:52PM -0800, Russ Taylor wrote:
> On 2/4/98 1:05 PM, Charles Scott (cscott@freeway.net) wrote
>
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Dick St.Peters wrote:
> >
> >> Our PM3s show _much_ lower lost-carrier percentages. I suspect this
> >> is mostly because we kept our analog service; people who have any
> >> problems holding connections to PM3s choose to use our analog
> >> numbers.
> >
> > Your PM3's show _much_ lower lost-carrier percentages because they
> >don't report a "lost carrier" as a lost carrier! Lost? Try dialing into
> >your PM3 with an analog modem then just disconnect the line from the back
> >of the modem (one would think that's a lost carrier) and look at what shows
> >up in the logs.
>
> Speaking of, has there been any acknowledgement from LE that this is
> indeed something they will look at and/or correct? So far I've heard
> only deafening silence whenever it is brought up :)
>
> (not asking for a time frame, just curious if it is an "issue" yet, or
> just something that will stay that way)
>
>
> Russ Taylor (rtaylor@cmc.net)
> Chambers Multimedia Connection Help Desk
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
-- - Steve - Systems Manager - Community Internet Access, Inc. - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.