Re: (PM) Lost Carrier Statistics

Russ Taylor (rtaylor@cmc.net)
Wed, 4 Feb 98 13:35:52 -0800

On 2/4/98 1:05 PM, Charles Scott (cscott@freeway.net) wrote

>
>
>On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Dick St.Peters wrote:
>
>> Our PM3s show _much_ lower lost-carrier percentages. I suspect this
>> is mostly because we kept our analog service; people who have any
>> problems holding connections to PM3s choose to use our analog
>> numbers.
>
> Your PM3's show _much_ lower lost-carrier percentages because they
>don't report a "lost carrier" as a lost carrier! Lost? Try dialing into
>your PM3 with an analog modem then just disconnect the line from the back
>of the modem (one would think that's a lost carrier) and look at what shows
>up in the logs.

Speaking of, has there been any acknowledgement from LE that this is
indeed something they will look at and/or correct? So far I've heard
only deafening silence whenever it is brought up :)

(not asking for a time frame, just curious if it is an "issue" yet, or
just something that will stay that way)

Russ Taylor (rtaylor@cmc.net)
Chambers Multimedia Connection Help Desk

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.