No, that is what proxy-ARP is for.
>since the user's IP is in the same network as the mail server? Seems
>rather inefficient to me....
If you change the user netmask, you WILL screw up your routing. Anything
other than /32 WILL route mutliple IPs to the USER. Do you really want
to kill your ethernet routing by trying to route it all to the user
instead? I didn't think so.
-MZ
-- Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.