RE: (PM) Chain Yanking Resolution: MZ and others.
Chad Scott (chad@txdirect.net)
Wed, 28 Jan 1998 15:34:15 -0600
On Wednesday, January 28, 1998 3:13 PM, Dave Stewart
[SMTP:portmstr@hom.net] wrote:
> At 03:38 PM 1/28/98 -0500, Jeff Woods wrote:
> >an AT&T 5ESS-11 switch, which they claim is NI-2 compliant. I told
them
> >it didn't matter, since my equipment had a specific setting for that
brand
> >of switch.
>
> Around here, it's all DMS-100, and I always configure for DMS-100 instead
> of NI-1 or NI-2. And never had a glitch.
>
> I've got a tech support guy who keeps insisting on telling users to set
> their ISDN modems for NI-1, since the DMS-100 is allegedly NI-1
> compliant... and then comes to me when their modems won't work - and I
tell
> him the same thing over and over... "set the switch type to DMS-100"...
> which solves the problem every time.
This goes both ways though. I have an ISDN line out of an AT&T (Lucent,
actually =) ) 5ESS switch. If I configure my OR-U for 5ESS, I get 64k on
the first channel and 56k on the second and it blows up randomly. If I set
the switch to NI-1, it runs perfectly.
Chad Scott
Network Operations
Internet Direct, Incorporated
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.