Just check the release notes. And watch your usage. If you ever dip
below 50K left free, upgrade.
Personally I'd upgrade just because RAM is cheap and it doesn't hurt to
have more than you need. Do it when you have the time on hand - don't
wait until it has to be done yesterday.
>customers, but to think that all this time has passed (2 years I've had
>it) and I can't even assign multiple IP's to the ethernet interface. Just
ComOS 3.8
There are still many other vendors who don't do ethernet multihoming
too. It isn't unusual.
>my tiny POP, I'd just config the interfaces on all my PM's to have an IP
>on all my subnets and let proxy arp go to work for me.
I'd still use OSPF, subinterfacing is just ugly in my opinion.
>Now, I know that RIP is bad to begin with, but what I don't understand is
>why did portmaster 1 send a RIP announcement to portmaster 3 only saying
>that it had B.0, which would cause IPs in B to be sent to Portmaster 3,
>then 1 (the router and other PM's think B is on 3), but why didn't
>portmaster 2 do the same, causing it to try 3, then 1 then 2?
He who updates last, wins. And if there are two routes to the same
network with the same cost, the first is used.
-MZ
-- Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.